ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Effects of the social media interference factor on memory consolidation in adolescents

About authors

1 Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia

2 Belgorod State National Research University, Belgorod, Russia

3 Kursk State Medical University, Kursk, Russia

Correspondence should be addressed: Ekaterina A. Petrash
Ostroviryanov, 1, Moscow, 117997, Russia; ur.liam@hsartep

About paper

Author contribution: all authors contributed to study planning, literature analysis, data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation equally.

Compliance with ethical standards: the study was approved by the Ethics Commitee of the Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (protocol № 217 of 18 April 2022) and conducted in accordance with the framework legislation "On Protection of Public Health"; the informed consent to examination was submitted by all participants.

Received: 2022-10-13 Accepted: 2022-11-14 Published online: 2022-12-16
|
  1. Repovs G, Baddeley A. The multi-component model of working memory: explorations in experimental cognitive psychology. Neuroscience. 2006. 139: 5–21
  2. Alberini CM. Memory Reconsolidation, 2013; 81–117. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-386892-3.00005-6.
  3. Grigoryan GA, Markevich VA. Konsolidaciya, reaktivaciya i rekonsolidaciya pamyati. Zhurnal Vysshej nervnoj deyatel'nosti. 2014; 64 (2): 123–36. Russian.
  4. Velichkovskij BB. Rabochaya pamyat' cheloveka: Struktura i mexanizmy. M: Kogito-centr, 2015; 247 s. Russian.
  5. Dozorceva EG., Kiryuxina D. V. Kiberbulling i sklonnost' k deviantnomu povedeniyu u podrostkov. Prikladnaya yuridicheskaya psixologiya. 2020; 1 (50): 80–87. Russian.
  6. Andreeva AO. Manipulirovanie v seti Internet. Informacionnaya bezopasnost' i voprosy profilaktiki kiberehkstremizma sredi molodezhi. 2015: 21–28. Russian.
  7. Kudryavcev IA. Deviantologiya izmenenij lichnosti podrostkov v social'nyx setyax (fenomeny i zakonomernosti deficitarnoj transformacii). Deviantologiya. 2021; 5 (2–9): 3–13. DOI: 10.32878/devi.21-5-02(9)-3-13. Russian.
  8. Yudeeva TV. Motivaciya destruktivnogo kommunikativnogo povedeniya podrostkov v social'nyx setyax. Mezhdunarodnyj nauchno-issledovatel'skij zhurnal. 2022; 2–2 (116): 178–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23670/IRJ.2022.116.2.066. Russian.
  9. Pis'mo Ministerstva obrazovaniya i nauki Rossijskoj Federacii ot 28.04.2014 N DL-115/03 «O napravlenii metodicheskix materialov dlya obespecheniya informacionnoj bezopasnosti detej pri ispol'zovanii resursov seti Internet». Dostupno po ssylke: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_123707/8968082babe2e09c403b4254022a2abd2ff908e1/. Russian.
  10. Lewis DJ. Psychobiology of active and inactive memory. Psychol. Bull. 1979. 86: 1054–83
  11. Lewis DJ, Bregman NJ, Mahan JJ Jr. Cue dependent amnesia in rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1972; 81 (2): 243–47
  12. Roozendaal B, McGaugh JL. Memory modulation. Behav Neurosci. 2011; 125 (6): 797–824. DOI: 10.1037/a0026187. PMID: 22122145; PMCID: PMC3236701.
  13. Velichkovskij BB. Testirovanie rabochej pamyati: ot prostogo k slozhnomu i snova k prostomu. Teoreticheskaya i ehksperimental'naya psixologiya. 2014; 7 (2): 133–42. Russian.
  14. Anoxin KV. Mozg i pamyat': biologiya sledov proshedshego vremeni. Vestnik Rossijskoj akademii nauk. 2010; 80 (5-6): 455. Russian.
  15. Isaacs E, Vargha-Khadem F. Differential course of development of spatial and verbal memory span: A normative study. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 1989; 7: 377–80. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.1989.tb00814.x.
  16. Bochaver AA, Dokuka SV, Sivak EV, Smirnov IB. Ispol'zovanie social'nyx setej v internete i depressivnaya simptomatika u podrostkov. Klinicheskaya i special'naya psixologiya. 2019; 8 (3): 1–18. DOI: 10.17759/psyclin.2019080301. Russian.