2023 / 02

Next Paper
DOI: 10.47183/mes.2023.023

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Sibling position as a condition for the formation of some formal and dynamic features of athletes

Gornov SV, Rakitina OV, Bogun TV
About authors

Federal Research and Clinical Center for Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation of the Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia

Correspondence should be addressed: Tatiana V. Bogun
B. Dorogomilovskaya, 5, Moscow, 121059, Russia; ur.liam@1nugob

About paper

Author contribution: Bogun TV — data acquisition, study concept and design, manuscript writing, literature review, data interpretation; Rakitina OV — literature review, planning the empirical phase of the study, analysis and interpretation of the results, editing; Gornov SV — editing, approval of the final version of the article, general management.

Compliance with ethical standards: the study was performed in accordance with the guidelines “Organization and Execution of Psychophysiological Assessment of the Russian National Team Athletes Within as Part of Extensive Medical Examination” and approved by the Academic Board of the Federal Research and Clinical Center for Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation of FMBA of Russia (protocol № 4 of 3 June 2016), it was also in line with the guidelines “Assessment of the Highly Trained Athletes’ Psychological State as Part of Extensive Medical Examination” and was approved by the Academic Board of the Federal Research and Clinical Center for Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation of FMBA of Russia (protocol № 16 of 29 March 2018); the informed consent was submitted by all study participants.

Received: 2023-05-29 Accepted: 2023-06-20 Published online: 2023-06-29
|
Fig. 1. Comparison of the features of the resource potential between athletes with different sibling positions (based on the Mann–Whitney U test) according to the Perinatal Experience – Resource Potential method
Fig. 2. Comparison of the formal and dynamic features of athletes with different sibling positions (based on the Mann–Whitney U test) according to the QFDPP questionnaire Score
Table 1. Significant differences in the indicators of formal and dynamic features of the athletes with different sibling positions (based on the Mann–Whitney U test)
Note: * — differences at the significance level of p < 0.05; BPM 2 — the second basic perinatal matrix; PP — psychomotor plasticity.
Table 2. Matrices of intercorrelations among the athletes’ formal and dynamic features and their resource potential (based on the Spearman's rank correlation coefficients; according to the QFDPP method)
Note: n = 20; BPM 1 — the first basic perinatal matrix; BPM 2 — the second basic perinatal matrix; BPM 3 — the third basic perinatal matrix; BPM 4 — the fourth basic perinatal matrix; PER — psychomotor ergicity; IER — intellectual ergicity; IP — intellectual plasticity; CP — communicative plasticity; PR — psychomotor rate; IR — intellectual rate; ME — motor emotionality; IE — intellectual emotionality; CE — communicative emotionality. Gray — correlations at the significance level of p < 0.05; light gray — correlations at the significance level of p < 0.01; dark gray — correlations at the significance level of p < 0.001.