ISSN Print 2713-2757
ISSN Online 2713-2765
SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL REVIEWED JOURNAL OF FMBA OF RUSSIA
Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. Licensee: Pirogov University.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY).
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY).
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Concept of medical psychophysiological examination of personnel of nuclear facilities
About authors
State Scientific Center of the Burnazyan Federal Medical and Biological Center, Moscow, Russia
Correspondence should be addressed: Zoya F. Zvereva
Pestelya, 9, ap. 146, Moscow, 127490; ur.xednay@10averevz
About paper
Author contribution: FS Torubarov, ZF Zvereva — data processing and article authoring. All authors participated in the discussion of the results.
Compliance with ethical standards: the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the State Scientific Center of the A.I. Burnazyan Federal Medical and Biological Center (minutes #32s of October 31, 2018); all human research procedures conform to the requirements set by the institutional and/or national committee on research ethics and the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments.
Received: 2021-02-19
Accepted: 2021-03-02
Published online: 2021-03-20
|
Fig. 1. Concept of psychophysiological examination
Fig. 2. Medical monitoring system for employees of nuclear facilities
Table 1. FS of CNS registered in Group 1 (n = 720)
Note: * — significant differences with the group showing high indicator value at (p < 0.5), as established by the χ2 test
Table 2. SFF CNS indicators at high, medium and low functional activity, Group 1 (n = 720)
Note: * — significant differences with SFF "Cortex" at (p < 0.5), as shown by the χ2 test; * • — significant differences with SFF "Cortical-subcortical interaction" at (p < 0.5), according to the χ2 test
Table 3. Automated PPE reportexample
Table 4. Integral indicator of visual-motor reaction tests, RHIC patients (n = 24)
