2021 / 02

Next Paper
DOI: 10.47183/mes.2021.018

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

The limitations and capabilities of wipe samples analysis in control of contamination of facilities with highly toxic organic compounds

Shachneva MD, Leninskii MA, Savelieva EI
About authors

Research Institute of Hygiene, Occupational Pathology and Human Ecology Leningrad Region, Russia

Correspondence should be addressed: Mariya D. Shachneva
Kapitolovo, r.p. Kuzmolovsky, Vsevolozhsky r., 188663 Leningradskaya obl.; ur.liam@ayiram_avenhcahs

About paper

Author contribution: Shachneva MD — carrying out the experiment, summarizing the results, article authoring and editing; Leninskii MA — carrying out the experiment, article authoring; Savelieva EI — academic advising, article authoring.

Received: 2021-05-28 Accepted: 2021-06-14 Published online: 2021-06-26
|
  1. Saveleva EI, Radilov AS, Kuznecova TA, Apraksin VF. Issledovanie sostava gazovydelenij bitumno-solevyh mass, vkljuchajushhih produkty unichtozhenija iprita. Zhurnal prikladnoj himii. 1999; 72 (9): 1501–5. Russian.
  2. Munro NB, Talmage SS, Griffin GD, Waters LC, Watson AP, King JF, et al. The sources, fate, and toxicity of chemical warfare agent degradation products. Environmental Health Perspectives. 1999. 107 (12): 933–74.
  3. Crenshaw MD, Hayes TL, Miller TL, Shahnuon CM. Comparison of the hydrolytic stability of S-(N,N-diethylaminoethyl) isobutyl methylphosphonothiolate with VX in dilute solution. J Appl Toxicol. 2001; 21 (S3–S6): 53–56.
  4. Willison S. Wipe selection for the analysis of surface materials containing chemical warfare agent nitrogen mustard degradation products by ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A. 2012; 1270: 72–79.
  5. Postanovlenie Glavnogo gosudarstvennogo sanitarnogo vracha Rossijskoj Federacii ot 28.01.2021 # 2 «Ob utverzhdenii sanitarnyh pravil i norm SanPiN 1.2.3685-21 «Gigienicheskie normativy i trebovanija k obespecheniju bezopasnosti i (ili) bezvrednosti dlja cheloveka faktorov sredy obitanija» (Zaregistrirovano 29.01.2021 # 62296). Available from: https://docs.cntd.ru/ document/573500115 (data obrashhenija: 25.05.2021). Russian.
  6. Saveleva EI, Leninskii MA, Vasileva IA, Karakashev GV, Samchenko NA. Opredelenie sledovyh kolichestv O-izobutil-S[(2-dijetilamino)jetil] metilfosfonotioata i toksichnogo produkta ego gidroliza metodom vysokojeffektivnoj zhidkostnoj hromatografii s tandemnym mass-spektrometricheskim detektirovaniem. Analitika i kontrol'. 2021; 25 (3): 43. Russian.
  7. Annesley TM. Ion Suppression in Mass Spectrometry. Clin. Chem. 2003; 49: 1041–4.
  8. Jessome LL, Volmer DA. Ion Suppression: A Major Concern in Mass Spectrometry. LCGC North America. 2006; 24: 498–511.
  9. Antignac J, Wasch K, Monteau F, Brabander H, Andre F, Le Bizec B. The ion suppression phenomenon in liquid chromatography– mass spectrometry and its consequences in the field of residue analysis. Anal Chim Acta. 2005; 529: 129.
  10. Hernon-Kenny LA, Behringer DL, Crenshaw MD. Comparison of latex body paint with wetted gauze wipes for sampling the chemical warfare agents VX and sulfur mustard from common indoor surfaces. Forensic Science International. 2016; 262: 143–9.
  11. Wilson SA. Investigation of the Persistence of Nerve Agent Degradation Analytes on Surfaces through Wipe Sampling and Detection with Ultrahigh Performance Liquid ChromatographyTandem Mass Spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2015; 87: 1034–41.