2022 / 04

Next Paper
DOI: 10.47183/mes.2022.050

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Solution to the problem of designing a safe configuration of a human upper limb robotic prosthesis

Bureev ASh1,2, Golobokova EV1,2, Zhdanov DS1,2, Kosteley YV1,2, Koshelev RV2, Seleznev AI1,2, Fomenko EA2
About authors

1 Center for Development of Science, Technology and Education in the Field of Defense and State Security, National Research Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russia

2 Federal Research and Clinical Center of Medical Rehabilitation and Balneology of the Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia

Corresponding author: Dmitry S. Zhdanov
Krasnoarmeyskaya, 14, Tomsk, 634029, Russia; ur.liam@vonadhZ_S_D

About paper

Funding: The study was conducted in the context of execution of the State Task by the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia, project #FSWM-2022-0008.

Acknowledgments: Natalya Abdulkina, deputy general director of the Federal Scientific and Clinical Center for Medical Rehabilitation and Balneology of the Federal Medical Biological Agency, for comprehensive support of the researchers; Alexander Vorozhtsov, vice-rector for research and innovation activities of the National Research Tomsk State University, for his contribution to the scientific progress in the field of medical robotics.

Compliance with the ethical standards: Conclusion of the local ethical committee at the Federal Scientific and Clinical Center for Medical Rehabilitation and Balneology of the Federal Medical Biological Agency #1 of July 06, 2022. At this stage, the study involved no patients, therefore, no signed voluntary informed consents forms were required.

Received: 2022-12-06 Accepted: 2022-12-20 Published online: 2022-12-30
|
  1. Lassig R, Lorenz M, Sissimators E, Wicker I, Buchner T. Robotics Outlook 2030: How intelligence and mobility will shape the future. 2021. The Boston Consulting Group.
  2. Joseph F. Robotics in Service. Engelberger, 1989; 248 p.
  3. Alemzadeh H, Raman J, Leveson N, Kalbarczyk Z, Iyer RK. Adverse Events in Robotic Surgery: A Retrospective Study of 14 Years of FDA Data. PLOS ONE. 2016; 11 (4): e0151470. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151470.
  4. Taylor GR, Kleeman L. Grasping unknown objects with a humanoid robot. 2002.
  5. Kragic D, Christensen HA. Survey on Visual Servoing for Manipulation. Comput Vis Act Percept Lab. 2002; 15 p.
  6. Dong G, Zhu ZH. Position-based visual servo control of autonomous robotic manipulators. Acta Astronautica. 2015; 115: 291–302. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2015.05.036.
  7. Vahrenkamp N, Wieland S, Azad P, Gonzalez D, Asfour T, Dillmann R. Visual servoing for humanoid grasping and manipulation tasks. Humanoids 2008 — 8th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots. 2000. DOI: 10.1109/ichr.2008.4755985.
  8. Chaumette F, Hutchinson S. Visual servo control, Part I: Basic approaches. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine. 2006; 13 (4): 82–90.
  9. Espiau B, Chaumette F, Rives P. A new approach to visual servoing in robotics. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation. 1992; 8 (3): 313–26. DOI: 10.1109/70.143350.
  10. Chaumette F. Potential problems of stability and convergence in image-based and position-based visual servoing. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences. 66–78. DOI: 10.1007/ bfb0109663.
  11. Michel H, Rives P. Singularities in the determination of the situation of a robot efector from the perspective view of 3 points. Technical Report 1850, INRIA Research, 1993.
  12. Chaumette F. 2004. Image Moments: A General and Useful Set of Features for Visual Servoing. IEEE Transactions on Robotics. 20 (4): 713–23. DOI: 10.1109/tro.2004.829463.
  13. Tahri O, Chaumette F. Point-based and region-based image moments for visual servoing of planar objects. IEEE Transactions on Robotics. 2005; 21 (6): 1116–27. DOI: 10.1109/TRO.2005.853500.
  14. Tahri O, Mezouar Y, Chaumette F, Corke P. Decoupled ImageBased Visual Servoing for Cameras Obeying the Unified Projection Model. Robotics, IEEE Transactions on. 2010; 26: 684–97. DOI: 10.1109/TRO.2010.2051593.
  15. Dementhon DF, Davis LS. Model-based object pose in 25 lines of code. International Journal of Computer Vision. 1995; 15 (1–2): 123–41. DOI: 10.1007/bf01450852.
  16. Lowe DG. Three-dimensional object recognition from single twodimensional images. Artif Intell. 1987; 31: 355–95.
  17. Malis E, Chaumette F, Boudet S. 2-1/2D visual servoing. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation. 1999; 15 (2): 238–50.
  18. Wilson WJ, Hulls CCW, Bell GS. Relative end-effector control using Cartesian position based visual servoing. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation. 1996; 12 (5): 684–96. DOI: 10.1109/70.538974.
  19. Corke PI. Visual control of robot manipulators — a review. Visual Servoing: Real-Time Control of Robot Manipulators Based on Visual Sensory Feedback. 1993; pp. 1–31.
  20. Corke PI, Hutchinson SA. A new partitioned approach to imagebased visual servo control. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation. 2001; 17 (4): 507–15. DOI: 10.1109/70.954764.
  21. Deguchi K. Optimal motion control for image-based visual servoing by decoupling translation and rotation. Proceedings. 1998 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Innovations in Theory, Practice and Applications (Cat. #. 98CH36190). DOI: 10.1109/iros.1998.727274.
  22. Gans NR, Hutchinson SA. Stable Visual Servoing Through Hybrid Switched-System Control. IEEE Transactions on Robotics. 2007; 23 (3): 530–40. DOI: 10.1109/tro.2007.895067.
  23. Kermorgant O, Chaumette F. Combining IBVS and PBVS to ensure the visibility constraint. 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 2011. DOI: 10.1109/iros.2011.6048254.
  24. Pang Y, Huang Q, Jia D, Tian Y, Gao J, Zhang W. Object manipulation of a humanoid robot based on visual Servoing. 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 2007. DOI: 10.1109/iros.2007.4399445.
  25. Moughlbay AA, Cervera E, Martinet P. Real-time model based visual servoing tasks on a humanoid robot. Intelligent Autonomous Systems 12. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2013; c. 321–333.
  26. Agravante DJ, Cherubini A, Bussy A, Kheddar A. Humanhumanoid joint haptic table carrying task with height stabilization using vision. 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 2013. DOI: 10.1109/iros.2013.6697019.
  27. Hogan N. Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation. American Control Conference. 1984; pp. 304–313. DOI: 10.23919/ACC.1984.4788393.
  28. Aristidou A, Lasenby J. FABRIK: A fast, iterative solver for the Inverse Kinematics problem. Graphical Models. 2011; 73 (5): 243–60. DOI: 10.1016/j.gmod.2011.05.003.